The modelling of this pattern is a bit more complicated matter. The role of the actor within the activity can be further modelled with a role. While the encoding of the modelling in Turtle can be seen belowĬodebox 1. Agency ¶Īnother important aspect to declare is the agency within an activity, which can be modelled simply as:Į12 Production → P14 carried out by → E21 Person The encoding of the modelling in Turtle is pretty straightforward:Ĭodebox 1. The CRM modelling follows:Į12 Production → P33 used specific technique → E29 Design or Procedure A quite important one for us was the technique used. This type of creation is modelled in CRM using the E12 Production Entity, using the pattern:Į22 Man-Made Object → P108 was produced by → E12 Production Technique used ¶Ī production itself can be contextualised using diverse properties that augment the information about this activity. We model the physical creation of artefacts, such as paintings or photos, using the class E12 Production, a subclass of Event which described a specific activity which results in the creation of one or more new physical object. It is possible to click on the pictures to enlarge it.Īll the prefix used within the document can be found on. This solution has been taken to give the possibility to the readers to comment, download and embed the codebox.Įach graphical representation of the codebox is created using the ontologyviz tool. Each pattern is made explicit using an example which it is both encoded in RDF using Turtle and presented as a codebox and in a graphical form.Įach codebox is hosted as Gist on GitHub and embedded on the page. The modelling choices are recorded as generalisable patterns. The document outlines modelling choices in relation to temporal entities such as activities and statements which specify agency, causality, and other properties that, within CRM, can be considered to belong to this domain.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |